Low t study

In the studies Mischel and colleagues conducted at Stanford University, [1] [7] in order to establish trust that the experimenter would return, at the beginning of the "marshmallow test" children first engaged in a game in which they summoned the experimenter back by ringing a bell; the actual waiting portion of the experiment did not start until after the children clearly understood that the experimenter would keep the promise. Participants of the original studies at the Bing School at Stanford University appeared to have no doubt that they would receive a reward after waiting and chose to wait for the more desirable reward. However, Mischel's earlier studies showed there are many other situations in which children cannot be certain that they would receive the delayed outcome. [13] [14] [15] [16] In such situations, waiting for delayed rewards may not be an adaptive response.

Low t study

low t study


low t studylow t studylow t studylow t studylow t study